General

• careful with definition cards
  • they can we meet

What they say

TVA = Topical Version of the Aff => explains why you can do K in topical debate

• Carrot approach
  • Agree, but not tooo off limits
  • A2
    • Line by line their interp
    • explicit limits good
    • Any K aff can be run from anything in a textbook
• Stick approach
  • our approach better bro
  • education policy bad
  • Good to read TVA to this
• Bomb Approach
  • Trolling debate good
  • FUNFUNFUNFUNFUN
  • kinda just trolly
  • says debate is bad
  • no real TVA

Offence FW args

Fairness

• You no learn from ze K debate
• debate is a game
• how can the game be more fair
• fairness >> anything, max fairness
• is there fairness w/ schools
  • Income inequality etc
  • Private schools suck
  • Which one creates a NEUTRAL topic
• A2
  • PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS
  • Improve fairness in round, so it evens out

Education

• have to concede that debate → education
• which model of debate is best for education
• aff is monologue, if neg can’t listen, then there is no debate
• movements
  • Basically we need to become the people that lead movements
  • Current movements are unorganized
  • Lakey says that debate is essential to movements
  • Leads to out of round impacts, need nuanced clash, critical thinking (noot kritikal thinking), etc
• way we learn in debate is by engaging with each other
• implicit in debate is a game --> no education
• K debate generally bad bc its sooooooo broad
• fairness controls education debate, slash education arguments on the flow
• Think generally that its not true, bc its not true
• No one does debate for education bruh, we all here to win
• weigh between two ways of education
  • eg. discussions around identity
  • is content the most important way of debate

tvas - topical version of the aff

• plan text, plan text that is topical under your interp
• why the aff doesn’t get any of their offense
• Topical Version of the Aff => explains why you can do K in topical debate