- Comparison of models
- prove why the model of debate that alows for X is bad
- My limits offence outweighs
- Use your limit interp to solve theirs
- DO NOT BECOME A T HACK, just have it as a tool
Impacts
- Limits
- How many affs fit in a limit
- whether those limits are good or bad
- Can't prepare affs which moots the negative
- only things you can say are bad impact turns
- only generics
- can't prepare and reads generics and no meaningful clash
- Depth
- helps understand stuff better
- To fix aff generics
- Need aff flex to avoid generics
- Stale debate
- TRY to clash, and new things are good
- Too much debate on generic things
- prove limits by citing afirmatives
- functional limits
- core generics make it so affs w/out x lose
- ex. states cp, needs fed key warrant
- Ground
- removes key discussions good for education/fairness
- losing states cp ex.
- fed important for education
- also w/out it no func limits
- not abt research
- Precision
- Why you are credentially superior
- mostly education which is why we should be policymakers
- Predictabilty
- Kinda bad
- What is predictable?
- is it average person vs debaters
- kinda falls onto limits
Weighing
- Strength of link
- How you link to education and prove why it links
- exclude 1 area vs like a billion new affs
- who REALLY has a link to education/fairness
- they underlimit the topic etc
- fairness vs education
- why one outweighs the other
- side bias
- prove how its harder for one side for another
- then you help the biased side
- Roll of the side
- Leverage education off side bias
- ONLY EDUCATION from neg testing aff
- only education is innovation of the affirmative
- causes neg and aff offence
Reasonability
- If we're close enough then just let us in
- Competing interps is based of offense defence
- Leads the neg to constantly read T
- don't vote neg unless its impossible to be negative